Hi Packmaniacs,
could somebody explain the rational of Packman repos for Evergreen 11.1,
that are in fact unusable due to an invalid signature format?
Advertised here:
http://en.opensuse.org/Additional_package_repositories
Result:
Retrieving package libdrm-2.4.23-3.pm.53.1.i586 (2/99), 86.0 K (223.0 K
unpacked)
Installing: libdrm-2.4.23-3.pm.53.1 [error]
Installation of libdrm-2.4.23-3.pm.53.1 failed:
(with --nodeps --force) Error: Subprocess failed. Error: RPM failed:
error:
/var/cache/zypp/packages/packman-essentials/i586/libdrm-2.4.23-3.pm.53.1.i586.rpm:
Header V4 RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 1abd1afb
error:
/var/cache/zypp/packages/packman-essentials/i586/libdrm-2.4.23-3.pm.53.1.i586.rpm
cannot be installed
Abort, retry, ignore? [A/r/i]: i
Retrieving package taglib-1.6.3-1.pm.15.1.i586 (3/99), 202.0 K (639.0 K
unpacked)
Installing: taglib-1.6.3-1.pm.15.1 [error]
Installation of taglib-1.6.3-1.pm.15.1 failed:
(with --nodeps --force) Error: Subprocess failed. Error: RPM failed:
error:
/var/cache/zypp/packages/packman-essentials/i586/taglib-1.6.3-1.pm.15.1.i586.rpm:
Header V4 RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 1abd1afb
error:
/var/cache/zypp/packages/packman-essentials/i586/taglib-1.6.3-1.pm.15.1.i586.rpm
cannot be installed
Abort, retry, ignore? [A/r/i]: i
While it is possible to install packages without checking the signature
manually, this results in a damaged rpm database.
These repos would be very useful for another year at least, but not in
this form. Could this be resolved somehow without much effort on your
side? (I haven't looked into the BS signer, but no other repo suffers
from these obstacles.
Best regards,
Pete
_______________________________________________
Packman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
