On 2011-05-31 21:36:47 (+0200), Norbert Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hallo, > > some rpm release numbers would be "downgraded". > example: > -rw-r--r-- 1 10000 10000 7458 2011-03-11 > 05:40 > ./packman/suse/openSUSE_11.3/Extra/i586/dhcpdetector-1.0b-1.pm.1.1.i586.rpm > -rw-r--r-- 1 10000 10000 6510 2010-12-05 > 01:45 > ./packman/suse/openSUSE_11.3/Extra/i586/dhcpdetector-1.0b-1.pm.2.1.i586.rpm > > The new rpm has a lower release number (and the same version). > Is it a mistake?
Hmm.... yeah, but we don't have complete control over those release numbers, as part of it (what's behind the .pm.) is managed automatically by the OBS. > Some rpms changed the release number from 0.pm.x.y to x.z. > example: > ./packman/suse/openSUSE_11.3/Extra/i586/libgdal1-debugsource-1.8.0-1.pm.1.17.i586.rpm > > and > ./packman/suse/openSUSE_11.3/Extra/i586/libgdal1-debugsource-1.8.0-1.19.i586.rpm > Is it a mistake? Yes, that was my bad, I forgot to apply a patch after our last OBS upgrade. Fixed now. cheers -- -o) Pascal Bleser /\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green _\_v http://fosdem.org -- we haz conf
pgpCuPxenzCnO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
