On 06/19/2011 05:21 PM, Manfred Tremmel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011 schrieb Dave Plater:
On 06/18/2011 04:49 PM, Manfred Tremmel wrote:
That's correct, mjpegtools 1.9.0 and 2.0.0 is not compatible and
some packages do not compile with 2.0.0. So I've put the old one
as mjpegtools19 on the build server. I hope we can remove it in a
short time, when all programms are updated to support mjpegtools
2.0.0.
No abi problems found so far but you've got a problem with the devel
sub packages. The .so links are generated without versions, you have
to append the 1.9's and 2.0's to their names otherwise if both devel
packages are installed, the .so links will come from the last
package to be installed. I've tried manually naming
"lib<mjpegname>.so" to "lib<mjpegname>.1.9.so" but my checking tool
doesn't like it. Those names are created by libtool during make
install. Unfortunately I can't install packages I've built in my
Packman home:davepl so I've no way of testing this.
You should be able to checkout the binaries with
osc getbinaries<project> <package> <target> <architecture>
Haven't tried that method yet. Which packages won't build with mjpegutils-2.0.0?
Dave
_______________________________________________
Packman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
