On 29 November 2011 23:55, Marc Schiffbauer <[email protected]> wrote: > * Cristian Morales Vega schrieb am 28.11.11 um 13:42 Uhr: >> On 27 November 2011 21:37, Marc Schiffbauer <[email protected]> wrote: >> > * Cristian Morales Vega schrieb am 27.11.11 um 20:08 Uhr: >> >> On 27 November 2011 13:52, Cristian Morales Vega <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > The VLC spec file includes an "aout-pulse" subpackage with a >> >> > "Supplements: packageand(%{name}-noX:pulseaudio)" line, but that >> >> > supplements doesn't appears in the primary.xml file from the repo >> >> > metadata. >> >> > >> >> > %if 0%{?suse_version} >= 1140 >> >> > %package aout-pulse >> >> > Summary: VLC Audio Out for Pulse Audio >> >> > Group: System/Libraries >> >> > Requires: %{name} = %{version} >> >> > Requires: vlc-noX = %{version} >> >> > Supplements: packageand(%{name}-noX:pulseaudio) >> >> > >> >> > %description aout-pulse >> >> > Extends VLC with Pulse Audio Support for Audio Out >> >> > %endif >> >> > >> >> > In fact there isn't a single "Supplements" or "packageand" in the file. >> >> > >> >> > Any idea? >> >> >> >> I guess createrepo 0.9.8 is being used? Up to openSUSE 11.2 createrepo >> >> 0.4.11 was included in the main distro with a >> >> "createrepo-0.4.11-missing-tags.patch" that took care of the extra >> >> dependencies in openSUSE. Since openSUSE 11.3 createrepo 0.9.8 is >> >> included, but it doesn't seem to be able to handle the openSUSE >> >> specific tags and there is no patch... >> > >> > Hm, thats bad then. Time for 11.2 to go EOL then ;) >> > >> > We are using 0.4.11, but the Debian version. >> >> Easy fix? >> The sources are in >> https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=createrepo&project=DISCONTINUED%3AopenSUSE%3A11.2. >> createrepo-0.4.11-missing-tags.patch is the important patch for this >> case, but probably other patches could be also relevant. But with >> things like "rpm.RPMTAG_SUGGESTSNAME" I guess the openSUSE RPM, with >> it own patches, it also required. > > > I'd prefer a complete package where I would extract the python > scripts and install them somewhere with a "11.2" suffic and only use > that for 11.2 and 11.2 based versions. > > Comments?
Not sure I follow you here. Just in case, it is clear that the problem is with the metadata of the repositories for EVERY openSUSE version, true? Isn't a problem limited to 11.2 but to every version with a RPM with support for weak dependencies (and openSUSE has had support for weak dependencies since... before I started using it with 10.0). You could ask in the OBS mailing list, but my guess is they use the same createrepo for everything, including Fedora. _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
