On 01/14/2012 02:37 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > All, > > Until recently all cinelerra updates have gone fine. With the present update > in packman, there is a dependency issue with mjpegtools that is significant. > The > specifics are: > > 18:29 alchemy:~> cat cinelerra-conflicts.txt > #### YaST2 conflicts list - generated 2012-01-13 18:28:49 #### > > cinelerra-2.2cv20111114-8.1.x86_64 requires mjpegtools19, but this requirement > cannot be provided > uninstallable providers: > mjpegtools19-1.9.0.0-14.2.i586[ftp.uni-erlangen.de-suse] > mjpegtools19-1.9.0.0-14.2.x86_64[ftp.uni-erlangen.de-suse] > [ ] do not install cinelerra-2.2cv20111114-8.1.x86_64 > > [ ] Following actions will be done: > deinstallation of mjpegtools-2.0.0-36.1.x86_64 > deinstallation of dvdshrink-2.6.1-10.3.noarch > deinstallation of tovid-0.34-1.3.noarch > deinstallation of dvdwizard-0.7.0-3.16.noarch > deinstallation of dvd-slideshow-0.8.4-1.3.noarch > deinstallation of dvdrip-0.98.11-5.3.x86_64 > deinstallation of mandvd-2.6-3.3.x86_64 > deinstallation of ldvd-2.0.2-5.3.x86_64 > deinstallation of ogmrip-mpeg-0.2-3.3.x86_64 > deinstallation of DVDStyler-2.0.1-1.5.x86_64 > deinstallation of qdvdauthor-2.1.0cvs-5.21.x86_64 > deinstallation of kdvdauth-0.9.2-2.2.x86_64 > deinstallation of lxdvdrip-1.77-1.1.x86_64 > [ ] do not install cinelerra-2.2cv20111114-8.1.x86_64 > > [ ] break cinelerra by ignoring some of its dependencies > > Has anyone else run into this or found a workaround? It appears all other > packages have moved to mjpegtools 2. What is strange here is that the > currently > installed cinelerra-2.2cv20111114-7.5 is happily installed an using > mjpegtools-2.0.0-36.1.x86_64. Is this a regression? > > i haven't had this issue (yet,) but you can stick to cinelerra-2.2cv20111114-7.5 for a while
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
