Am Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:18:37 +0100 schrieb Pascal Bleser <[email protected]>:
> * we don't link from multimedia:libs any more, hence duplication > of work (arguably, there are issues in that repository, I've > tried to explain that to maintainers there), No, we could link to multimedia:libs, if the maintainer of libXYZ on OBS takes care about PMOBS! > * "frozen" packages rather than "the latest": both options are > fine, but we always did the latter (ideally we'd have both), Frozen only if we don't have a maintainer for the package. > * I believe we should rather use different OBS _projects_ to do > that, rather than those weird package names. Oh, not weird, easy to handle, every user see why we build a package on PMOBS! Now i have to search for packages which are obsolete and unmaintainded... > > On the latter: what about > > * Essentials-11.4 -> frozen uncrippled versions of what ships with > openSUSE 11.4 (oss) > * Essentials-12.1 -> same for 12.1 > * Essentials -> latest, built for 11.4, 12.1 and Factory > > For SLE11, I guess we only need a "Essentials-SLE11" and not > build for SLE11 in "Essentials", as it's going more and more out > of date. > > Dunno about Tumbleweed. It's not much different from Factory, > hence only built in "Essentials". Hm, for every $DIST a new repo is easier then 1140_libxyz? :D Detlef
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
