>From >http://sourceforge.net/projects/xine/files/xine-lib/1.2.0/README.txt.asc/view it seems the only reason the soname was changed is because of "Reorder and modify public structures to reduce the holes caused by padding especially on 64-bit architectures". Is this correct? In such a case there should be no need to maintain both versions of the packages since the API has not changed. There can be real concerns... I can't check right now if the libraries use symbol versioning to avoid the usual problems of mixing the two libraries. Just want to know what's the current situation. What's your plan here?
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman