Hi all, On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:12:51 +0200 Sagi Ben-Akiva <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello packagers and contributors, > > XBMC 11.0 - Eden was released 2 days ago. > > I think we should release packman office package for xbmc 11.0 soon. > I'm building xbmc from trunk (git source) for a while and would like > to build xbmc 11.0, > and need your advice : > Should I override xbmc package from Multimedia project, > or should I create a new package for version 11, e.g. xbmc-eden ? > > Currently I started a project named XBMC-Eden in my home project > which we can use. > > What do you think ? I think we should name it xbmc as always. Eden is just the codename and it isn't a fork or something. Also this makes the update processes easier. zypper up and it's done. When somebody installs both for example you must change the paths on xbmc-eden in the spec file or this or it collides with the original xbmc package. And without eden its more clearly to see thats the "original" xbmc and not a fork or a xmbc with extra patches/functionality or so. OT: Does the youtube plugin work with v11.0? Regards Philipp -- Philipp Seiler Open Source & Linux advocator Mail: [email protected] GPG Key: 0x75911461 Jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
