On 2012-05-22 17:29:31 (+0200), Guido Berhoerster <guido+links2linux...@berhoerster.name> wrote: > On 22.05.2012 17:07, PMBS wrote: > >New submit request 225 on urwid by posophe > >https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/225
> >Needed by wicd (coming soon) > This should be named python-urwid according to packaging policy. > Also, both packages are already maintained in OBS, why do you want > to duplicate them here instead of pushing them into Factory? In > particular python-urwid would be useful to have in Factory since > it's a dependency for other packages as well. Factory isn't that relevant here or, rather, a different topic. I agree, I don't see why we would have wicd in Packman in the first place, much better suited to be put into build.o.o and a relevant repository there (and then pushed into Factory as well). In any case, if we do need something that is already packaged in some repository on build.o.o, then we can link them, e.g.: osc -Apm linkpac \ openSUSE.org:devel:languages:python/python-urwid \ Multimedia You just need to put "openSUSE.org:" in front, as that will tell our OBS instance that it has to use the remote API to build.o.o. Please don't link to home: repositories, for obvious reasons (quality) ;) But as said, wicd should be packaged on build.o.o instead. cheers -- -o) Pascal Bleser /\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green _\_v http://fosdem.org -- we haz conf
pgp4GgiQ6JrgX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
