El sáb 30 jun 2012 20:04:06 CLT, Cristian Morales Vega escribió: > On 27 June 2012 22:31, Cristian Morales Vega <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 27 June 2012 22:23, Cristian Rodríguez <[email protected]> wrote: >>> El 27/06/12 14:14, Cristian Morales Vega escribió: >>>> Meaning "update to unreleased git version". >>>> Why? >>>> >>>> On 27 June 2012 18:38, PMBS <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> New submit request 236 on npapi-vlc by crrodriguez >>>>> https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/236 >>>>> >>>>> - Update to version 2.0.2 >>>>> >>> >>> is there a problem with it ? >> >> No that I know of. But when a stable version is changed by a >> development one usually there is a good reason. There is one here? > > I would not feel as a good maintainer of the package if I would not > know why the actual tarball is the one it is. I just need to know > that, *why* the tarball was updated? There was a problem with the old > version?
I am sorry, but I am not getting this fuzz, I simple updated a package with an snapshot that is 2 days newer than the official release, it is clearly labeled as such in the tarball name and afaik it is working.. If this is a problem it can be reverted and I also can stop wasting my time in absurd discussions. _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
