Pascal Bleser <[email protected]> писал(а) в своём письме Mon, 24
Dec 2012 14:18:12 +0300:
No, that'll just make the package obsolete itself, as 20110000
is considered to be higher than 0.8.0 by RPM.
I'm usually cautious enough to cope with such situations by
naming snapshots 0.0+2012.... but alas, I didn't in this case.
No good solution to this situation now, except to always include
the timestamp, e.g. Version: 20121224+0.8.0
cheers
You are right. Such obsoletions are ignored.
--
Dmitriy DarkneSS Perlow / Linux x64
_______________________________________________
Packman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
