Martin Herkt <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Mar 2015 18:16:03 +0300:
> Yes - so far I know. smplayer now can use MPlayer mplayer2 and mpv as
> backend, so here is no need to have smplayer2, which was a frontend
for
> mplayer2. Current default is mpv - if not overwritten by an local
config
> file.
As the maintainer of SMPlayer2 (which is now dead and will not be
revived) and
someone who is more or less involved with mpv development, I have to
actively
discourage from using SMPlayer with mpv, and I think it is a really bad
move
to make it the default player backend.
Support for mpv is so bad it actually succeeds in making the experience
worse
than with MPlayer.
I was afraid I was the only person with the same experience. Now I fell
myself free enough to resolve it ;)
--
Best regards,
Dmitriy DA(P).DarkneSS Perlow @ Linux x64
_______________________________________________
Packman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
