Hi Sagi, On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:44:06 +0200 Sagi Ben-Akiva <[email protected]> wrote: > Kodi Jarvis 16.0 was released yesterday, and it is already being > built in my home project. > > https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/home:sagiben/kodi.binary-addons > https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/home:sagiben/kodi > > In latest Kodi, all the binary addons were branched out from Kodi > github repository to a separate repositories. > > I did the same and divided Kodi and it's binary addons into 2 > packages : kodi, kodi.binary-addons. > > My questions are : > 1. Do you think we should keep them in 2 separate projects or merge > them to one ? > 2. Should we provide a standalone package for each binary addon ?
I would prefer option 1 - at least for the moment. I do not know how other distributions handle this, but it might be a dependency nightmare if any binary addon is separate. Just a question: you have also kodi-pvr.addons in your repo, is this a subset of the binary.addons? Greetings, Stefan -- Stefan Botter zu Hause Bremen
pgpq3M3z6fakD.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
