On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, 15:26:46 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > Am 16.11.2016 um 14:34 schrieb Manfred Hollstein: > > What is the status/intention with regard to such packages? Does anybody > > know and wants to explain it here? > > mpv is built in OBS/42.2, linked to the ffmpeg version in OBS/42.2. > ffmpeg, as rebuilt in PMBS, links to OBS/42.2. > > The intention is that there has to be some consistency between the > packages in OBS and PMBS. Back in the days when ffmpeg was not in OBS > everything came from PMBS. Since Leap ffmpeg used also in OBS by many > packages. The result is that PMBS should not simply build ffmpeg from > the OBS devel project, because that will break SONAMEs, instead the > exact source version for the given release is rebuilt. This is > implemented for TW and 42.2, it will not be implemented for 42.1, 13.x > and SLE_12. > > I'm sure the suggested vendor change when upgrading from 42.1 to 42.2 > will not cause issues.
Hmm, what would be the suggested recipe then?
1. zypper dup # accept all vendor changes packman ->
obs
2. zypper dup --from multimedia:apps # accept all vendor changes
3. zypper dup --from packman/Essentials \
--from packman/Multimedia # accept all vendor changes
If Multimedia works afterwards, ok, but, what I really hate (to be
honest) is the to be expected amount of "xxx packages will not be
updated" messages when running "zypper up" on a daily basis, with "xxx"
being packages available both in multimedia:apps and Packman...
Is this what you have/had in mind?
> Olaf
Thx, cheers.
l8er
manfred
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
