2017-08-02 10:08 GMT+02:00 <mar...@pluskal.org>: [...] > As Richard explained, this might be a bit dangerous adventure for > packman.
I think we got the threatening message at this point. > Apart from that I would say that motivation for moving to > packman is a bit weak +1 > my understanding is that move is motivated by hurt feelings after > discussion about copyright attribution with OP, and > by his opposition against including hamradio/sdr stuff in Factory and > Leap. Yes, clearly, there is no other reason to have those packages at Packman rather than OBS. > This would basically go against most of recent efforts to move > everything that is possible/allowed to OBS/Leap/Factory and would put +1 > additional load on packman's resources, which are much more scarce than > those of OBS. +1 Couldn't agree more. _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
