On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 09:47 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 at 12:23 AM > From: "Walter Fey" <dl8...@darc.de> > > > > I agreed to this and informed him, that due to serious legal > > concerns, > > I cannot publish the copyright remark that is pointing to SUSE > > LINUX GmbH, > > Nuernberg, Germany without a written approval from this company. > > This is the part I understand the least. > What would be the legal ramifications or even just the risks in > attributing copyright to a third party? Or is mentioning a trademark > that > concerns you? > > Furthermore, you wouldn't even have to use the "Copyright SUSE GmbH" > line. > Several other packagers just put in their name, current year and > everyone > who adds something to it would add his own. > I also do not understand this - and in hardware:sdr some packages have copyright attributet to SUSE, some just author of package, some both.
Apart from this I fail to understand resistance to having hamradio in Leap and Factory as seen in [1] - there is nothing preventing creation of maintenance updates updating packages released in Leap if there is sound reason for doing so, and for Factory - it is by definition kept up to date. 1. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/477291
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman