Hi again,
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019, 16:15:25 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> Moin,
>
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2019, 22:01:35 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> > Hi Sagi,
> >
> > On Thu, 03 Jan 2019, 18:36:57 +0100, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote:
> > > Hi Manfred,
> > >
> > > Yes, I noticed that, did not have a chance to fix it, was busy with
> > > building
> > > kodi binary addons.
> > > Thank you for helping, I'll wait for your updates.
> >
> > updated packages for libdrm and libmicrohttpd allowed building kodi
> > successfully now. I'll wait for your kodi-binary-addons package for
> > testing... ;)
>
> thanks to Olaf's help, we now have a newer libmicrohttpd in Multimedia,
> thanks a lot Olaf! This leaves libdrm being out of date, still playing
> _some_ role in the graphics stack of the underlying OS. What do other
> people think about serving these packages here, not getting them from
> openSUSE:Leap:42.3{,:Update}? I can certainly live with them coming from
> my own home: repo, but this might not be acceptable for others, so...
> Any ideas, opinions?Update: the libdrm packages are not needed at runtime, so it would be possible to link e.g. openSUSE.org:openSUSE:Leap:15.0/libdrm, build and enable, but do not publish it for 42.3. This way we would not impact a user's installation of base packages. Cheers. l8er manfred
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
