to., juli 2, 2020 at 07:53 skrev Olaf Hering <[email protected]> følgende:
The question is: why is it a hard requirement anyway? I think there
is the libav package. What are the benefits of bad+ugly?
Olaf
They are not a hard req no - they are however upstreams "prefered"
encoders/decoders for things like DTS, h264 and h265. Further when
googling for howtos, they are the toplisted ones.
We should allow our endusers to use whatever plugins they prefer, just
because the gst-libav package exists as an alternative, does not mean
that we should only provide that one.
In any case, this discussion is now moot, as after I did the subs (that
did get acked into staging), the "normal" bad and ugly packages got
branched
for 15.2 anyway. Dr's for the new alternative packages in staging were
filed and acked, so they are now gone.
/B
_______________________________________________
Packman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
