Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2021 at 10:13 AM From: "Mathias Homann" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [packman] python error with youtube-dl > > Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2021, 09:47:14 CET schrieb Luigi Baldoni: > > Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2021 at 7:18 PM > > From: "Malcolm" <[email protected]> > > > > > >>> The Packman version doesn't build the python module? Is there any > > > >>> point in actually having it on Packman anymore since it's built on > > > >>> OBS > > > >> > > > >>The packman version has a cron job that offers the latest version > > > >>available within minutes, I believe. Whereas on openSUSE one has to > > > >>wait for a manual update, submission to Factory and code review. > > > >> > > > >>Since it's updated even multiple times a day, at times, I think the > > > >>packman way offers a better service to the final user. > > > >> > > > >>Regards > > > > > > > >Hi > > > >Then I would suggest a systemd service and timer created and submitted > > > >to Network Utilities. Cron is dead! ;) > > > > > > > >It could just be created as an extra package, the main goal is to > > > >remove the unnecessary packages to reduce build resources, this seems > > > >like a candidate.... > > > > > > Have you looked at the cronjob and script? It's not for end user use > > > > I never claimed that, only that, as far as I understand, it's run on PMBS > > without manual intervention which would not be possible on OBS. > > > > Paging Olaf for further details. > > the cronjob runs on my host at home, twice per day, and basically checks if > the sources used in the most recent version on PMBS are still current - and if > not it updates them locally and resubmits to PMBS.
Oh, I see. Would you do the same in network:utilities then? Still, if the package were to be (as for many other) linked and not aggregated, what would be the advantage? Regards _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
