to., jan. 27 2022 at kl. 11.23 +0100 +0100 skrev Olaf Hering
<o...@aepfle.de> følgende:
If an expanded package name is requested, there will be a conflict
due to exact %version-%release Requires in the devel package.
Hence the established practice to refer to capabilities via
pkgconfig() instead of ever-changing package names.
Since this package is fully rebuilt anyway there is zero downside in
using pkgconfig().
Well I only used the non pkgconfig for "Packmans" benefit, so fine by
me, I'll change it back to using pkgconfig().
/Bjørn
_______________________________________________
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
