On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Xavier wrote: > > > Diogo Dutra wrote: > > > > > >> Hi guys, I have found a bug in makepkg, the makepkg -b dont install > > >> builded packages as depencies, it install as explicited packages and > > >> it is not good, I make a patch that revolve this problem. > > >> > > >> Im sorry for any mistakes of mine. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > This doesn't look bad but I am never very confident with makepkg :) > > > > > This patch looks good. > > > > <snip> > > + echo "$(gettext " --asdeps Install package as > > dependencies")" > > <snip> > > > > The description of the --asdeps option should be "Install package as a > > dependency"
Yes, the package is only one, not plural, it is more correct... and this is my first patch submmited online, I dont have experiencies with this. > > Haven't even looked at the patch yet, but should we really even be > keeping this -b option around in makepkg? It seems like something > another script (such as makeworld) should do. This isn't emerge here. > > -Dan I agree with you, but I think the -b continue existing as -s, but -b instead execute makepkg in recursive mode, my idea is implementing the find deps $SCRROOT in another script (such as makeworld?) and -b call this script as -s call pacman, because I think -b and -s have to coexist. > > > > _______________________________________________ > pacman-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev > _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
