Allan McRae wrote: > Dan McGee wrote: > >> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> 3. libalpm - fix comment on noextract in pmhandle_t. >>> >>> >> So we definitely use this and it still works? Heh. We might need to >> beef up pactests in this area. >> >> > > Well, a quick search showed it is still used in the libalpm code. The > option is documented in the pacman.conf man page so I assume it still works! > >
And there is a pactest - upgrade070.py. We should probably have a sync one too.... Which brings up the issue of how it handles the file conflict. It seems I have a task for the day! Allan _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
