I agree, openssl is a must-have in every system :-) 2008/6/2 Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Antonio Huete Jimeenz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For the checksum verification it might be ok to use openssl since it's in > > base for almost all BSD system. But what about linux? You'll have to > install > > it before using makepkg, and this means a dependency. > > > > In the case of CHOST usage, I haven't explained it fine. It's not related > to > > this checksum issue. I'll try to explain it better in another thread :) > > > > openssl is in the base group of archlinux, so it is supposed to be > installed on every system. > But when you look at the number and the importance of the packages > requiring it, it is fully justified : > http://archlinux.org/packages/122/ > I can even hardly imagine a linux distro without it. Or am I mistaken? > > _______________________________________________ > pacman-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev >
_______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
