On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I won't graciously accept it! :) > > I'd much rather keep longopts, so I think a parse_options() function > that uses getopts in combo with some manual longopt parsing is our > best bet. >
Ok so let's just revert to the old way: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-May/011858.html You can see the loop was approximately twice longer because longopts and shortopts are handled separately, but it might be the best compromise. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
