On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Sure. Is there any warning message that is actually useful when using >> those two options? I can't think of anything but you and Dan know the >> code-base far better than I do. >> >> > > There might be some useful warning / error messages in case something > is wrong, like a corrupted database or other problems like that. > But I would think that most of them would happen on normal -S > operations too, so it might not be a big problem. I am not sure > though.
Why not screen it down to errors only? That way we don't hid those if they occur, but the warnings that these messages omit will be gone. I would rather not have special case handling for these in the backend code. -Dan _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
