2008/6/16 Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Why would we need to change license, pkgver and url? This is for > splitting packages that come in a single source file... Otherwise you > make two PKGBUILDs. Can anyone give me a possible reason for changing > these.
IIRC once I maintained a package (a game) that had its data under a different license than source, but was packaged in one tarball (my memory may be wrong though). > I really think we need to take a big step back here. What we really > need is to have a prototype PKGBUILD for a split package that is > relatively agreed upon. As I said in other emails there are multiple > ways to do this and one needs to be chosen. Once the decisions have > been made about the approach to take, and a naming scheme for > functions/variables, then we can look at patches. At the moment the > patches seem without a defined goal (at least to me). agree -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
