On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We really should have coverage for the sections in libalpm/add.c so I am > writing pactests for those now. It would be easy to add one for -Rcs > and changelogs as well so that will give fairly complete coverage of > libalpm.
I completely agree, thanks for this. I tried to add a few tests way back when for some of the frontend things that we never really "tested", which could be as simple as the output of the -Q set of commands. However, these tests help bring the coverage to 100% so we catch awesome segfaults and such, so I would be more than happy to take pactests that increase our coverage. -Dan _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
