Hm. I wasn't clear again. > > Yes, the patch is fine, but I don't like it: > > This is too "specific". Tomorrow an other user will arrive that his > foo put bar directory to /var/lib/pacman.
Alternative I. (future): > This /var/lib/pacman "root-cleanup" was introduced because of the old > db format, and can be dropped soon (or make configurable), that would > be ideal. Alternative II (now, skip-clean-dir option): > I know that a configuration option for "skip-clean" is an > overkill, but it is still better (imho) than this hardcoded > lost+found. > > Bye > _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
