On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No hard feelings if it came across that way. :) >
Sorry, I realize my mail sounded harsh but this was not my intention. Both my patch and yours should reproduce a consistent behavior of vercmp, which is the only thing that matters here. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list pacman-dev@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
