Shoud I change my patch to use zipdoc/docdirs as Xavier suggested? It's trivial, so I just need an ok from other devs. :)

Tiago

Xavier escreveu:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This seems a good idea to me and the patch looks good.  One small comment
below.


Tiago Pierezan Camargo wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tiago Pierezan Camargo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt |    7 +++++++
 etc/makepkg.conf.in    |    2 ++
 scripts/makepkg.sh.in  |    9 ++++-----
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt b/doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt
index ca9df02..d6dd7dd 100644
--- a/doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt
+++ b/doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt
@@ -136,6 +136,13 @@ Options
       that are located in opt/, you may need to add the directory to this
       array. *NOTE:* Do not add the leading slash to the directory name.
 +**MAN_DIRS=(**{usr{,/local}{,/share},opt/*}/{man,info} ...**)**::
+       If "zipman" is specified in the OPTIONS array, this variable will
+       instruct makepkg where to look to compress manpages and docs. If
you
+       build packages  that are located in opt/, you may need to add the
+       directory to this array. *NOTE:* Do not add the leading slash to
+       the directory name.
Maybe change the description a bit:

...this variable will instruct makepkg where to look to compress man and
info-pages.



What about renaming the variable to be more relevant in the same time?

http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-August/012787.html

--
Tiago Pierezan Camargo
milopi @ irc.freenode.net

_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev

Reply via email to