On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > Using >= in the provides array is stupid so make it cause an error. > Fixes FS#12540. > > Also, use bash substitution rather than spawning new processes where > possible in the error checking. Move split package detection to a > better position. >
Only checking for >= looks strange to me, what about all the others : < , >, <=, etc.. Maybe we could simply prevent < and > in the provision, using the same bash substitution than for -. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
