On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Aaron Griffin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Xavier <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> I haven't looked at this in detail yet, but if this solution is more >>> portable and has no feature loss, why not use it by default? >>> >> >> I had the same question :P > > My guess would be optimization - that calling a C binary may be faster > than a bash loop. Not sure though, just a guess.
readlink and realpath would be faster i think, but not sure if that really matters for repo-add. I'll submit a new patch later which will replace readlink and realpath with the bash implementation. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
