On 24/02/2009, at 2:56 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Brendan Hide <[email protected]
> wrote:
Again, this will be properly fixed as soon as pacman correctly
takes into
account the errors given when doing the actual deployment.
Personally, I
like the idea of adding sanity checks - but only if they're done
properly.
;)
I wouldn't say that - we've talked about "proper transactions" for a
long time, and are still nowhere near a proper solution. So don't
expect this to be fixed soon, unless you're writing the patches :)
Has there been any (real) discussion about transactions? Perhaps a
wiki about design ideas would be good.
_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
