Sebastian Nowicki wrote:
On 12/03/2009, at 7:18 PM, Xavier wrote:
Otherwise, go go sqlite :)
Wasn't there a (set of) patch(es) for a "packed" format for the
databases (tar-like, iirc)? From what I remember there was a
performance improvement.
There was talk about moving to a tar based back-end but I don't remember
patches. There was some patches for an sqlite backend but given we
already need libarchive to extract the packages, a tar based backend
makes more sense to me.
Allan
_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
