On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > $ ./src/pacman/.libs/lt-pacman -Qy glibc pacman-git > glibc 2.9-4 > pacman-git 20090116-1 > file n°1512 (package 2/2): OK > No damaged packages. > > We should probably only do verification and not print the names of the > packages and run them through filters, unless anyone else has an > opinion.
Part of me would like to see: Checking glibc 2.9-4... OK Checking pacman-git 20090116... OK ...etc... Verification Complete 1512 files checked (2 packages) But... that could be a lot of output. It might be cleaner to see: Checking for missing files for installed packages # if any errors, output like: pacman-git: Missing file /etc/pacman.conf # endif Verification Complete: 1512 files (2 packages) _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
