Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
Anybody an asciidoc expert around here. The upgrade from asciidoc-8.4.0
to 8.4.{1,2} causes building docs to fail for me (output below). Anybody
want to look at this?
This fixes the error, but there is still lots of warnings given:
Name
----
+repo-add - package database maintenance utility
////
* If we use this below line, the manpage name comes out all weird. We also
* can't use two separate lines, which is quite annoying. *
repo-add, repo-remove - package database maintenance utilities
////
-repo-add - package database maintenance utility
It appears that a comment straight after the Name line is "not good"... I
haven't checked if the docs still look OK after fixing that.
Some of the warnings are apparently a known bug in asciidoc:
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc/browse_thread/thread/fd27add515597c06
Do we have a decent fix for this then? I'll accept patches that help
fix the build.
That patch I gave above is now on my working branch. After applying it,
every man page gives a warning (WARNING: [graphviz-block] missing
template section) during the build but this is apparently a bug in
asciidoc. The PKGBUILD man page give:
WARNING: PKGBUILD.5.txt: line 74: nested inline passthrough
WARNING: PKGBUILD.5.txt: line 74: nested inline passthrough
WARNING: PKGBUILD.5.txt: line 74: nested inline passthrough
WARNING: PKGBUILD.5.txt: line 74: nested inline passthrough
WARNING: PKGBUILD.5.txt: line 80: nested inline passthrough
WARNING: PKGBUILD.5.txt: line 93: nested inline passthrough
WARNING: PKGBUILD.5.txt: line 121: nested inline passthrough
These are due to things like `$$license=('GPL' 'FDL')$$`. They look no
different now than they did in the last pacman release so this seems
fine. May be something that needs looked into though.
Allan
_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
