On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dan McGee wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> When making a source package for a SCM PKGBUILD, makepkg should not >>>> update the pkgver/pkgrel. Noted in FS#14456. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <[email protected]> >>>> >>> >>> I saw your comment on this, and was a bit unsure about it. Although >>> the version doesn't have the same meaning on an SCM package, doesn't >>> it still have some meaning in telling us when the source package was >>> built? >>> >> >> My thinking is that the packager would only know that the package works with >> the current pkgver and not with any updated one. > > That is in fact much more sound logic. If there are no other > objections I'm fine with this too. Who am I kidding? Barely anyone > reads this list. :P
I do! And I'm fine with it. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
