On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Xavier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Nagy Gabor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >From 1572535efe01dfae1f28b74862dec21f2102f165 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Nagy Gabor <[email protected]> >>> Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:08:04 +0200 >>> Subject: [PATCH] Don't print "local/" with -Qs >>> >>> See FS#14642. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <[email protected]> >> >> Any objections to this? It is a longstanding "tradition" that we've >> had the local prefix, so I want to make sure this isn't a mistake, as >> this will definitely affect parsing of -Qs information as it can no >> longer be treated the same as -Ss information. >> >> I expressed my thoughts in the bug report that we keep it as is; I'll >> await a few more opinions before taking this route. If we do take it, >> I expect someone to fix the pacsearch script in contrib. :) >> > > It always bugged me that pacman outputs package names in a format that > it cannot handle itself. > > If we want to keep the local/ prefix, we should also support it on > every local operations. Not only -R, but also -Q, -Qi, etc.. > > I am curious about the operations on sync packages though, for example : > does pacman -Si handle the repo/ format?
Yes, definitely- all -S operations do so: dmc...@galway ~ $ pacman -Si testing/mlocate Repository : testing Name : mlocate Version : 0.22-1 <snip> dmc...@galway ~ $ pacman -Si core/mlocate Repository : core Name : mlocate Version : 0.21.1-1 <snip> _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
