On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Aaron Griffin<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Xavier<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Dan McGee<[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Aaron Griffin <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> 2009/3/23 Samed Beyribey <[email protected]>: >>>>>> Well i just noticed that, (probably) mailman rejects my attachment (it >>>>>> was 9.5k) >>>>>> so i've put it on my web site: >>>>>> http://eventualis.org/pacman/0001-fixed-typos-and-alignment-problem-in-Turkish-transla.patch.gz >>>>>> >>>>>> This is my last mail about this patch, again, i feel so sorry. >>>>> >>>>> This isn't your fault. >>>>> >>>>> Aaron, do we not allow gzipped and bzipped files through? >>>> >>>> I guess not. What's the mime-type for these? Considering mailman uses >>>> a whitelist, would anyone be able to construct a decent list that >>>> covers pretty much all attachment types we'd want? >>> >>> Thanks for changing the subject, btw. Here is a simple look at that >>> patch, gzipped and additionally unzipped and converted to bzip2. >>> >>> dmc...@galway /tmp >>> $ file --mime-type patch.gz >>> patch.gz: application/x-gzip >>> >>> dmc...@galway /tmp >>> $ file --mime-type patch.bz2 >>> patch.bz2: application/x-bzip2 >> >> >> bump :) > > Allowed attachments: > multipart/mixed > multipart/alternative > message/rfc822 > text/plain > multipart/signed > application/pgp-signature > application/octet-stream > application/x-tar > application/x-tgz > application/x-gzip > application/x-bzip-compressed-tar > application/x-bzip2
As an FYI, I added the last 5 this morning, but for this list (as opposed to the arch-* lists), we can probably allow everything through as I haven't seen rampant abuse. -Dan _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
