On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Allan McRae<[email protected]> wrote: > Gerhard Brauer wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> i would like to push this again, as a remainder... >> Maybe there are now more pacman Devs with the time to continue the work >> on GPG signed packages. >> We have the threads in 12/2008 here: >> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-December/007761.html >> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-December/007808.html >> >> I'd have the impression we're on a good way there - but lack of man >> power... > > I made notes of the additional patches that might be useful to add to Dans > new_gpg branch here: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman_Roadmap
Yeah, lack of manpower/interest/etc. We'll see if it ramps up a bit after 3.3 in the next two weeks, but it is definitely still in our minds. -Dan _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
