> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Nagy Gabor<[email protected]> wrote: > >> we had a section in the README about API CHANGES BETWEEN 3.1 AND 3.2 > >> do we need the same for 3.2 -> 3.3? > >> As you can see in the attached diff, there were quite a few changes as > >> well :P > > > > I will send a patch for this when we are in "patch freeze". (I have 4 > > pending patches, all of them change API.) > > > > Great to hear this :) > I think your 2 patches on working should be fine for 3.3. > What about the two for universal, you consider them ready for inclusion? > > I believe Dan wanted to include them after 3.3, but I don't know if > this was a final decision.
The universal branch is not ready, but I consider the 2 patches ready for inclusion (in fact, I have focused on fixing of FS#3492 and FS#5798 with the least API changes). However, I had not much time to test it and the inclusion of a _complete_ universal branch to ~4.0 would be nicer, so I am fine with Dan's roadmap. (However, I have no clue what to do with universal transaction at pacman front-end side...) I will send my "API changes" patch soon, based on my working branch, feel free to modify it, if needed. Bye _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
