On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Xavier<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So what is the preferred way here? Since we use handle->trans or
> handle->db_local in some places, why not everywhere?
>
>
Also it is worth noticing that in many cases, it works this way :
int SYMEXPORT alpm_trans_sysupgrade(int enable_downgrade)
{
....
return(_alpm_sync_sysupgrade(handle->trans, handle->db_local,
handle->dbs_sync, enable_downgrade));
}
So it is just the public function using the handle.
But why not just renaming _alpm_sync_sysupgrade(handle->trans,
handle->db_local, handle->dbs_sync, enable_downgrade));
to
alpm_trans_sysupgrade(int enable_downgrade)
?
I never understood what was the point of having all public functions
just stupid wrapper to internal ones.
_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
