On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Dan McGee<[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, that last one looks a bit silly with the paths at the top, doesn't it. Any > ideas? I'd be fine with showing the 0 errors lines all the time, it would just > require some grep foo for people to screen those out. That way, you can do > things like this (note that the output is slightly edited from what this patch > will produce, it is showing the output even with 0 missing files): >
I would be fine with never printing 0 error line, and dropping the verbose output. -Qk and -Qkq are just fine like that in my opinion. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
