On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Nagy Gabor<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > IMHO the default no answer is better. If pacman is invoked with > --noconfirm (see scripts), it is unpredictable what will happen. By the > way, I _want_ to install the specified packages, so by default, I would > say no. > > However, then it is not possible to test the remove_unresolvable feature > with pactest :-(.
bump? I would also prefer to keep the old behavior by default. Nagy had a simple patch for that. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
