On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Xavier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Laszlo Papp<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> --print-pkg and --print-uris looks good to me > >> > >> > > Me too, but it would be nice to keep the older -Sp option for > --print-uris, > > because everybody know it so :) > > > > I didn't mean to drop it > > > but would you keep your new feature on top of these two options : > >> --print-pkg and --print-uris only show non-download packages > >> --print-pkg --print-pkg and --print-uris --print-uris show all > >> ? > >> > > > > I think -Sp/-Spp is good for the uris related. > > > > > > I don't think you got it. What I was saying is that --print-pkg and > --print-uris are very similar options. > So it would be quite strange to not apply the same behavior to both. > > Yeah, I agree with you.
> But since --print-pkgs is only a long option, we would need to use > --print-pkg --print-pkg which is very ugly ... > Is it clearer now ? > --print-pkgs seems fine for me, the later one isn't so beautiful in fact, but when i say this i see the point of user, not the view from programmer/developer, because i'm not professional now in details. > > >> > >> an alternative : > >> what if we added the download size when ShowSize is used? > >> > >> > > I think it's a good idea, more information is better generally :) > > > > > > With alternative, I meant alternative. i.e. I would not take your > -Sp/-Spp patch, but only add the download size when ShowSize is used. > Would you be fine with that? > > Ah-so, I think it would be better to add it as a new feature, not an alternative. Maybe I'm wrong with my answers, because I don't know pacman in details so, like you, but i try to improve this feature from me, thanks :)
