On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Nagy Gabor <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Dan McGee schrieb: > > > Just as we do in -Qi, we can compute required by information for sync > > > database packages. The behavior seems sane; for a given package, the > -Si > > > required by will show all packages in *any* sync database that require > it. > > > > > > Implements FS#16244. > > > > > > > I was wondering about -Qi too: Finding the contents of the "Required By" > > field takes some time and I want an option to only show the information > > that is cheap to get. That same thought would apply to -Si. Maybe abuse > > -q here (as it has no effect on -Qi or -Si yet) and omit those checks > > with -Siq or -Qiq. > > > > Combined with my "-Sii would not be coherent with -Qii" complaint above, > maybe we should just move Requiredby to -Qii (and -Sii). And then the > new meaning of -Qii would be: more verbose. > > Bye > > PS: When finally we have fast database, these issues just disappear, so > maybe we should working on that instead of workarounding lots of > things... But that is not easy. ;-) > > > I agree with you Gabor, fast database could be the previous task for it., maybe I wrote it in my report, but maybe the next task is given :) So it's worth to deal with it instead of changing other working options to a not so coherent, because I guess fast database will be implemented in the future anyway. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
