Loui Chang wrote: > On Sat 10 Oct 2009 16:40 +0200, Xavier wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Xavier <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This looked good to me. >>> >> Sorry for the double mail. >> >> I just had one question : >> Will every package maintainer figure out easily that his ChangeLog is >> no longer included ? >> Or do we need a transition period deprecating the old way and >> including the new one ? > > I'd say just jump to the new behaviour. > It doesn't seem like ChangeLog is used often or for anything too > important yet. >
I second this, it's not worth the effort. By the way, was makepkg's changelog functionality documented somewhere? If not (couldn't find anything), I would expect that a maintainer, who used a changelog before, is kind enough to figure out the new behavior by reading the man pages.
