On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Cedric Staniewski <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > while implementing pacman's downgrade operation in bash, I noticed that > pacman also includes upgradeable package in the list of downgradeable ones. I > did not complete the downgrade, but I would assume that it would have > actually updated some of the packages. > In my bash function I filter the upgradeable packages out of the installed > ones and this is what I expected pacman would do, too. Apparently, this is > not the case and I wonder, if this is the intended behavior or if it should > be considered as a bug. > > According to the documentation, I would say this is intended, so the term > "downgrade" is a little bit misleading in my opinion. > >> Pass this option twice to enable package downgrade; in this case pacman will >> select sync packages whose version does not match with >> the local version. This can be useful when the user switches from a testing >> repo to a stable one. >
Yes it is the intended behavior. Note the second sentence : "in this case pacman will select sync packages whose version does not match with the local version." This means both upgrade and downgrade. Suggestions for improving the docs are welcome :)
