On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Cedric Staniewski <[email protected]> wrote:
> pkgbase is used in the following rm calls, and since pkgname can be
> present when pkgbase is not, it is safer to check for pkgbase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cedric Staniewski <[email protected]>
Looks good to me, Allan?
-Dan
> ---
> scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> index 3b29b31..e18ab15 100644
> --- a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> +++ b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ clean_up() {
> # If it's a clean exit and -c/--clean has been passed...
> msg "$(gettext "Cleaning up...")"
> rm -rf "$pkgdir" "$srcdir"
> - if [ -n "$pkgname" ]; then
> + if [ -n "$pkgbase" ]; then
> # Can't do this unless the BUILDSCRIPT has been
> sourced.
> rm -f
> "${pkgbase}-${pkgver}-${pkgrel}-${CARCH}-build.log"*
> if [ "$PKGFUNC" -eq 1 ]; then
> --
> 1.6.5.1
>
>
>