On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Andres Perera <andres...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Dan McGee <dpmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is this strictly necessary? You are changing one piece of code in the
>> entire codebase to require v3 or later and as weird as it sounds, I am
>> not going to let that fly. I won't be merging this unless it is v2 or
>> you give some darn good reasons why we should move to v3.
> Not really necessary. You can change it to v2, or I can do that if it
> requires a commit from me.

Nah that's good enough for me. I'll try to give this whole thing a
workout in the next day or two and see if I can come up with anything
else that we might want to tweak, however.


Reply via email to